During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.
Try our other sports emails: there’s daily football news and gossip in The Fiver, and weekly catch-ups for cricket in The Spin and rugby union in The Breakdown.
对涉嫌用于实施网络违法犯罪活动的相关卡、号、线路，公安机关可以要求有关服务提供者停止提供服务。对被害人报案，申请资金紧急止付的，公安机关可以按照国家有关规定，作出紧急止付、快速冻结、资金返还等决定，金融服务提供者应当予以配合。，详情可参考51吃瓜
2️⃣ 选择排序 (Selection Sort)，推荐阅读下载安装 谷歌浏览器 开启极速安全的 上网之旅。获取更多信息
Гангстер одним ударом расправился с туристом в Таиланде и попал на видео18:08，这一点在WPS下载最新地址中也有详细论述
Stop Putting Secrets in .env Files